In <20051029133321(_dot_)GB13644(_at_)co(_dot_)sapo(_dot_)pt> Jose Celestino
<japc(_at_)co(_dot_)sapo(_dot_)pt> writes:
Helo,
what can I make of this:
[japc(_at_)morgoth:~]$ dig txt portoeditora.pt
(...)
portoeditora.pt. 86400 IN TXT "v=spf1" "mx" "ptr"
"mx:servermail.portoeditora.pt" "mx:smtponi.portoeditora.pt"
"mx:smtppt.portoeditora.pt"
"mx:newsletters.portoeditora.pt" "ip4:213.58.193.36" "ip4:194.65.106.36"
"-all"
(...)
Aside the redundancy is this a valid record?
No, this SPF record is not valid. The separate strings are
concatinated together without any spaces added, and therefore is
equivalent to:
portoeditora.pt. 86400 IN TXT
"v=spf1mxptrmx:servermail.portoeditora.ptmx:smtponi.portoeditora.pt...
[japc(_at_)morgoth:~/libspf-1.0.0-p3/bin]$ ./spfqtool_static -i
212.55.154.196 -s japc(_at_)portoeditora(_dot_)pt
You didn't give me a helo host, using (nobody)
SPF short result: neutral
This is incorrect. The result should be "None" because there isn't a
TXT record that begins with "v=spf1 " (the space is important).
-wayne
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com