spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

[spf-discuss] Re: GMAIL mis-usage of SPF?

2005-11-17 14:46:07
Hector Santos wrote:

It is BAD.  It is terrible.

It's harmless, and the header field clearly said "best guess",
i.e. some kind of "receiver policy".  In that case you get a
PASS for "plausible" and a NEUTRAL for "who knows".  That's
still better than "NONE" if the "best guess" is good enough.

In theory you could also reject on a "best guess" FAIL base.
If it's clear that "best guess" is NOT a "sender policy" I
don't get why you are so excited, it's a receiver policy and
no new idea.
                         Bye, Frank


-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com