-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Wayne Schlitt wrote:
I think if you followed stuff real closely (granted, some of this was
on #spf), you will find that I was one of the ones who had to push to
get meetings. The absence of meetings recently I think is completely
due to the lack of anyone advancing any agenda items that needed to be
dealt with. Back in the spring, Frank was complaining (rightfully)
about the lack of SPF Council meetings to resolve stuff. I haven't
seen any complaints recently.
Everything Wayne said is true. (However, I had given up on trying to get
more frequent meetings a while ago already. And as I said, I think more
frequent meetings would have kept up the steam. I am not saying this to
put blame on anyone -- I am as much to blame as anyone.)
Ok, so maybe there should be more regular meetings, but scheduling is
always a problem. There is a lot of work that has to go into even a 5
minute meeting.
True as well. But there's no substitute for trying. ;-)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDgSbJwL7PKlBZWjsRAlNIAKCDDyX9eP7o2UHzm0XIyHsvimvxOwCgyJvE
nWEScJSj4/TERvA/G57Jy64=
=YzDd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com