On Mon, 14 Nov 2005, Koen Martens wrote:
Let me just add a cent to that, my intuition says that without a
body such as the spf council, spf loses 'weight'. If the councel is
dissolved, the community around spf might as easily dissolve. With
the council, there is a concrete idea of spf being 'alive',
I agree. I am happy with extending the term of existing council, or
electing a new one. But they need to be officially there - even if
there is nothing to do but wait for the RFC for the next 6 months.
But, in fact, updating the web site is a *very* important part of
the work while waiting for the RFC.
--
Stuart D. Gathman <stuart(_at_)bmsi(_dot_)com>
Business Management Systems Inc. Phone: 703 591-0911 Fax: 703 591-6154
"Confutatis maledictis, flamis acribus addictis" - background song for
a Microsoft sponsored "Where do you want to go from here?" commercial.
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com