spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [spf-discuss] Re: [spf-council] Re: SPF council: new elections or disolve?

2005-11-20 12:55:07
In 
<Pine(_dot_)LNX(_dot_)4(_dot_)62(_dot_)0511151743540(_dot_)19784(_at_)sokol(_dot_)elan(_dot_)net>
 "william(at)elan.net" <william(_at_)elan(_dot_)net> writes:

On Wed, 16 Nov 2005, Julian Mehnle wrote:

Personally, I think we should disolve the SPF Council.  There hasn't
been a meeting for months and that is because no one has offered any
agenda items that needed to be decided on.

(There should have been more regular meetings.  I as a council member have
been lobbying for regular if very concise meetings for a long time.  I
think it would have kept up the steam.)

Yes. With all due respect to Wayne, it appears the problem with less
regularity in SPF Council meetings started when Chuck departed - he 
appeared to have been quite good ad organizing such council activities.

heh.

I think if you followed stuff real closely (granted, some of this was
on #spf), you will find that I was one of the ones who had to push to
get meetings.  The absence of meetings recently I think is completely
due to the lack of anyone advancing any agenda items that needed to be
dealt with.  Back in the spring, Frank was complaining (rightfully)
about the lack of SPF Council meetings to resolve stuff.  I haven't
seen any complaints recently.

Ok, so maybe there should be more regular meetings, but scheduling is
always a problem.  There is a lot of work that has to go into even a 5
minute meeting.


-wayne

-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com