On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 12:40:02AM -0400, Stuart D. Gathman wrote:
I can see this for giving ../33 a permerror, but why is ../0 not allowed?
As Julian points out, it matches any IP4, but not any IP6.
If /0 is acceptable for netmasks in other protocols, fine. But
anything not being a netmask is unacceptable, as is anything
looking weird. /33 is weird for ip4. /00 is weird for any
protocol.
If most other protocols, that odd one excepted, think of /0 as an
error, I see no reason to accept it. If you want to forbid the
use of ip6: -ip6:0:::/128 -ip6:8000:::/128
(or something similar. Brain is not yet booted up fully)
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com