Julian Mehnle wrote:
So perhaps indeed we need a "softpass". Others (like you)
might say instead that we need a "hardpass", because they
consider today's "pass" a "softpass".
Existing policies use PASS for both purposes. Assuming default
"soft" and offering an explicit (opt-in) "hard" is the only way
forward I can see.
it would have to be defined very thoroughly.
Is anything wrong with the op=auth text ?
Frank
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com