On Friday 03 November 2006 05:33, Julian Mehnle wrote:
Scott Kitterman wrote:
Here is another v=spf1/PRA incompatibility scenario I ran across today
with one of my customers:
Return-Path: <localpart(_at_)mobileemail(_dot_)vodafone(_dot_)net>
...
Reply-To: username(_at_)example(_dot_)com
From: "John Doe" < username(_at_)example(_dot_)com>
Apparently Vodafone (in the UK) use their own return path for Blackberry
e-mails. This would be no problem for SPF, but creates a case where the
PRA and Mail From records for example.com need to be different.
Not really. They could easily add a "Sender:
(_dot_)(_dot_)(_dot_)(_at_)mobileemail(_dot_)vodafone(_dot_)net"
header. And I think they should.
The problem is that the 'They' that could do that is vodafone, not my
customer. Unless I can figure a way to do that with a Blackberry, I'm afraid
I'm going to have to recommend that he not publish SPF records.
Scott K
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com