spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [spf-discuss] Sender ID's PRA wouldn't be such a bad idea if... (was: MS Puts SID Patents Under OSP)

2006-11-03 08:06:50
On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 03:07:56PM +0100, Alex van den Bogaerdt wrote:
Microsoft lookst at "Reply-To: username(_at_)example(_dot_)com", uses the
SPF record (WHICH IS NOT A PRA RECORD), and matches the sending
host (vodafone) against the record.  This results in FAIL. 

Last I knew, Reply-To wasn't a header that PRA would use, so I'm having
trouble following your example.


-- 
:: Jeff Macdonald | Principal Engineer, Messaging Technologies
:: e-Dialog | jmacdonald(_at_)e-dialog(_dot_)com
:: 131 Hartwell Ave. | Lexington, MA 02421 
:: v: 781-372-1922 | f: 781-863-8118 
:: www.e-dialog.com

-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=735

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>