-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Frank Ellermann wrote:
Although it's ironic that SPF tries to emulate [the reverse-path] feature
killed seventeen years ago. Archaic or not, the reverse path was sound.
Well, not really. If all mail was getting checked for known and trusted
PGP/S/MIME signatures (i.e., trusted by the individual end-user), SPF and
all that other trouble wouldn't be necessary.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFFXN5ZwL7PKlBZWjsRAtJ/AKC8uqjHUotOML57f50RKpCcbj32HQCcD0Ri
gtn/lN6fYNH32XUBuplfDBk=
=w62I
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=735