Stuart D. Gathman <mailto:stuart(_at_)bmsi(_dot_)com> wrote on Saturday,
December
02, 2006 7:36 PM -0600:
On Sat, 2 Dec 2006, Julian Mehnle wrote:
Look, the problem is that everytime this comes up, after a while I
get tired debating it, but it always comes up again later because I
just can't get this "Pass means I authorized the message, but don't
blame me for it!" concept into my head. It doesn't make sense to
me. Not. Make. Sense. To. Me. :-(
A Modest Proposal: Intensifiers for SPF Results
We should introduce the '*' character as an "intensifier" to mean
"I really mean it". So, for example, the policy:
"spf3.14 ip4:1.2.3.4 *-all"
I'm particularly intrigued about applying this to "?". So
v=spf1 ip4:1.2.3.4 *?all
should indicate that you are more unsure of what you mean.
--
Seth Goodman
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=735