On Sunday 03 December 2006 09:53, Frank Ellermann wrote:
Scott Kitterman wrote:
I think it's the SOFTPASS that's missing and Pass == HARDPASS.
NO, PASS was always used in the sense "a bounce hits no innocent
bystander", we even have "v=spf1 +all" as perfectly valid policy.
I'll research the archives when I have some time.
Okay, admittedly my "always" doesn't cover discussions before
May 2004. If we'd wanted "PASS implies 4409 6.1" we'd have said
so, after all I quote these "enforced submission rights" often :-)
I think we did:
http://new.openspf.org/RFC_4408#cross-user-forgery
While we didn't cite chapter and verse of the RFC, I think the meaning is
pretty clear.
Scott K
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=735