Stuart D. Gathman wrote:
Permerror on invalid domain after macro expansion was added by
Mark Shewmaker as the 2nd revision.
I think I finally recall that this was triggered by a thread on
the devel list about "domain" foo..bar. What's the test suite
doing at the moment with a direct "a:foo..bar" (no macro) ?
And _why_ is it doing whatever it does ? <g>
I thought we had rejected that notion. It would make %{h}
useless because all the bogus HELOs would cause permerrors.
If folks would simply reject PERMERROR it's fine. But if they
don't reject PERMERROR ignoring a macro-expanded <target-name>
foo..bar and moving on to the next mechanism(s) could be better,
if they at least reject FAIL (triggered by a later directive).
Frank
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=735