On Wed, 28 Mar 2007 19:11:19 +0200 Frank Ellermann
<nobody(_at_)xyzzy(_dot_)claranet(_dot_)de> wrote:
Scott Kitterman wrote:
Not all implementations support the trailing dot. Libspf
is at least one that does not.
We could add a rule to an informative "lessons learned" RFC:
"Never try to outsmart RFCs 2822 and (2)821 in AUTH48" :-)
Probably libspf has more important problems with RFC 4408,
I vaguely recall that it never supported Wayne's concepts
of predictable error handling and clear processing limits.
This is correct. Additionally, it's completely unmaintained AFAICT.
I don't recommend people use libspf, but it is the only SPF library used by
a number of applications and migration to a more modern one is non-trivial.
Scott K
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=735