-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Graham Murray wrote:
Michael Deutschmann <michael(_at_)talamasca(_dot_)ocis(_dot_)net> writes:
I think this is folly. It's a chicken game, with four states:
1A - forwarders use SRS, recipients do not enforce SPF
1B - forwarders use SRS, recipients enforce SPF
2A - forwarders operate traditionally, recipients do not enforce SPF
2B - forwarders operate traditionally, recipients enforce SPF
3 - forwarders use their own address in the RFC2821 Mail From.
That's in effect sender rewriting, of which SRS is just a specific
implementation. So it's basically the same as 1 in the above.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHf4/gwL7PKlBZWjsRAk/TAKC0UpKy4wWQEyUhtor/3YRK1ULnRQCg6DtD
He8dAjafpHOHZIcQv0zB6e4=
=MfzF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------------------------------------------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org
Archives: http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/735/=now
RSS Feed: http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/735/
Modify Your Subscription:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=2183229&id_secret=82148083-5c1d62
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com