-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Alessandro Vesely wrote:
SPF allows domains owners to state they bear no responsibility for
messages that FAIL to comply with the relevant policy, including
implied authorship and possible effects on the domains' reputation.
Then, who should be held responsible for the consequences of
delivering FAILed messages to an end user?
Who cares as long as it's not the owner of the domain that was forged?
It's not for the domain owner or for _us_ to assign responsibility for
that case.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHhlPawL7PKlBZWjsRAhDgAJ990bERmUOjWf3pPcDB2fJtgulrkQCeIbtW
+7sxYNGwu2cZxLpixGXgEl4=
=yCz+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------------------------------------------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org
Archives: http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/735/=now
RSS Feed: http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/735/
Modify Your Subscription:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=2183229&id_secret=84331061-b59603
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com