spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [spf-discuss] Top problems with SPF acceptance

2008-03-02 19:39:22
On Sun, 2 Mar 2008 19:20:33 -0600 Don Lee 
<spfdiscuss(_at_)caution(_dot_)icompute(_dot_)com> 
wrote:
On Sunday 02 March 2008 14:40, Don Lee wrote:
RFC 4405 (SUBMITTER) seems to me a good, workable idea that when 
combined
with SPF, could go a long way toward solving "the forwarding problem".

Is this getting any traction, and if not, why not?

No.

1.  Proposed by Microsoft to solve problems with SenderID.  Tied 
irretrevably 
to their Sender ID PRA patents.

2.  Replaces an SPF check of Mail From with a new arbitrary identity that 
can 
only be verified by accepting the body of the message.  

If you like Submitter, just do Sender ID.  It'll do a good job of 
ensuring no 
one abuses your domain name in resent-sender.

Scott K

Too bad.  The basic idea is straightforward and has advantages in both
implementation and deployment.

-dgl-

During the IETF MARID working group I suggested that and Microsoft declined 
to separate it from PRA.

Scott K

-------------------------------------------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org
Archives: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/735/=now
RSS Feed: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/735/
Modify Your Subscription: 
http://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=2183229&id_secret=95887956-51703a
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com