Re: [spf-discuss] Tracking userids --was: SPF, DKIM, and NIH
2009-10-23 09:30:58
David MacQuigg wrote:
I imagine that sender reputation services will become as
widespread as IP reputation services.
If the domain cooperates, they would take steps so as to stop those
[ab]users. In such case, while publishing all the data may still be
useful for checking the veracity of your activity, only your word
about the domain's cooperation is strictly necessary. I'd call such
activity vouching for that domain, in rfc5518's sense.
Domain reputation data is rarely published, because it is the key
ingredient in a commercially successful spam-blocking service. Most
services that rely on reputation, try to not even let customers know
what they are doing.
Then that's snake oil, IMHO. A similar argument should hold for X.509
server certificates: Those who don't say what checks they carry out,
presumably don't actually check anything.
-------------------------------------------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org [http://www.openspf.org]
Modify Your Subscription: http://www.listbox.com/member/
[http://www.listbox.com/member/]
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/735/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/735/
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF, DKIM, and NIH, (continued)
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF, DKIM, and NIH, Ian Eiloart
- Spear Phishing (was: [spf-discuss] SPF, DKIM, and NIH), Steven Dorst
- Re: Spear Phishing (was: [spf-discuss] SPF, DKIM, and NIH), Stuart D. Gathman
- RE: Spear Phishing (was: [spf-discuss] SPF, DKIM, and NIH), Steven Dorst
- [spf-discuss] Tracking userids --was: SPF, DKIM, and NIH, Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [spf-discuss] Tracking userids --was: SPF, DKIM, and NIH, Ian Eiloart
- Re: [spf-discuss] Tracking userids --was: SPF, DKIM, and NIH, Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [spf-discuss] Tracking userids --was: SPF, DKIM, and NIH, Ian Eiloart
- Re: [spf-discuss] Tracking userids --was: SPF, DKIM, and NIH, Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [spf-discuss] Tracking userids --was: SPF, DKIM, and NIH, David MacQuigg
- Re: [spf-discuss] Tracking userids --was: SPF, DKIM, and NIH,
Alessandro Vesely <=
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF, DKIM, and NIH, Stuart D. Gathman
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF, DKIM, and NIH, Ian Eiloart
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF, DKIM, and NIH, Stuart D. Gathman
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF, DKIM, and NIH, Alessandro Vesely
Re: [spf-discuss] SPF, DKIM, and NIH, Scott Kitterman
|
Previous by Date: |
RE: Spear Phishing (was: [spf-discuss] SPF, DKIM, and NIH), Steven Dorst |
Next by Date: |
Re: [spf-discuss] Tracking userids --was: SPF, DKIM, and NIH, Alessandro Vesely |
Previous by Thread: |
Re: [spf-discuss] Tracking userids --was: SPF, DKIM, and NIH, David MacQuigg |
Next by Thread: |
Re: [spf-discuss] SPF, DKIM, and NIH, Stuart D. Gathman |
Indexes: |
[Date]
[Thread]
[Top]
[All Lists] |
|
|