I'd suggest that SRS-forwarding to gmail would be less benefit
than say offering a dedicated second pop3/smtp-submission server with
dedicated credentials
just for the reason of ip-reputation {which srs-forwarding unfortunately
does tend to muddy} and additionally it allows users to webmail reply
from their work address via your servers {thus without having to allow
all gmail users the potential for forging mail and passing SPF}
I just don't like the security risk associated with Google holding a load
of our passwords in plain text.
--
Ian Eiloart
IT Services, University of Sussex
01273-873148 x3148
For new support requests, see http://www.sussex.ac.uk/its/help/
-------------------------------------------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org [http://www.openspf.org]
Modify Your Subscription: http://www.listbox.com/member/
[http://www.listbox.com/member/]
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/735/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/735/
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com