Antonio,
I don't agree with Linus. He ignores several things:
- By his method, you don't have the element's type, so it makes it less
readible, especially
for big structures.
- Linus ignores the option of attributes.
By combining the tree structure with both the element type and the
attributes, XML is capable
of describing an object oriented model.
Secondly, one could write an XML viewer/editor having the "naked" view mode
of Linus,
without the need to change or replace the XML language.
-- Amir
-----Original Message-----
From: Antonio Gallardo
[mailto:agallardo(_at_)agsoftware(_dot_)dnsalias(_dot_)com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 12:41 PM
To: xsl-list(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com
Subject: [xsl] Linus and XML
Hi:
I found this interesting link:
http://bitmover.com/pipermail/lmbench-users/2003-November/000076.html
in: http://codeconsult.ch/bertrand/archives/000188.html
I will be glad to hear your comments about this.
Best Regards,
Antonio Gallardo
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list