|
Re: grouping, sorting, splitting
2005-04-18 07:10:12
As Mike and David said we need a two pass approach..
Actually we just said that it's better (for your brain, if not for your
computer) to do it in two passes. I did explictly note that since the
sorting criterion is pretty simple in this case, you could probaby do it
in one pass.
David
________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk
________________________________________________________________________
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--
| Previous by Date: |
Re: grouping, sorting, splitting, Mukul Gandhi |
| Next by Date: |
RE: [Fwd: Upgrading Saxon XSLT 1.0 support addressing known limitations], Michael Kay |
| Previous by Thread: |
Re: grouping, sorting, splitting, Mukul Gandhi |
| Next by Thread: |
Re: grouping, sorting, splitting, Mukul Gandhi |
| Indexes: |
[Date]
[Thread]
[Top]
[All Lists] |
|
|