Re: [xsl] Referring to stylesheet itself, possible in XSLT 1.0, but how in XSLT
2006-10-17 08:48:20
Colin Adams wrote:
I don't exactly understand your problem.
Why can't you use a system-rewrite entry in an XML catalog?
I know of the existence of XML Catalogs, but I have no clue as to how to
use/utilize them. But it may fit my needs, indeed.
Here's the full story of why I go through all this trouble of uris and
uri resolution.
Our system contains several hundredths of stylesheets (user override
templates). Anyone user or company usually only has a few of them and
won't see the other stylesheets. All stylesheets are in some local
directory. All common stylesheets, includes and sources are inside a
global directory. That global directory structure is recreated each time
a particular process is started.
I want all stylesheets to act as if they are inside this general
directory. And that works, using xml:base. Perhaps I did not choose the
right technique, but anyway, it works. This way, all user-defined
stylesheets can simply refer to the paths relative to the general base.
Which is what they should do.
There are some flaws in this system. I.e., when a use wants to create a
stylesheet that is an include to another stylesheet. His only option is
to use either an absolute path or a relative one, relative to the base dir.
For logging purposes, all stylesheets can use a set of generic functions
during their process. One of which (should be) is outputting the
currently used stylesheet. Something like the following:
// Stylesheet : streamserve-tbl.xslt
// Processor : SAXON 8.7.3 from Saxonica
// Processing date : 17 October 2006
// Processing time : 17:37:02.640
For illustration, here is the (simplified) structure of the files as it
is currently (but it is likely to change, which is all the more a reason
for having a general solution):
common
common/dtd
common/functions
common/unparsed
xslt-def-import
xslt-def-import/format-a
xslt-def-import/format-b
xslt-def-import/format-c
xslt-def-import/format-x/ext-y
xslt-def-import/format-x/ext-z
xslt-def-export/format-a
xslt-def-export/format-b/ext-x
xslt-def-export/format-c/ext-z
xslfo/format-a/pdf
xslfo/format-a/afp
xslfo/format-b/pdf
other/user-a/own-formats
other/user-b/own-formats
etc. Any xslt stylesheet in one of the other-than-common directories,
receives an xml:base to the common location so as to 'think' as if it
where there. That way, all logic is in one place, while retaining the
possibility to keep specialized parts together as well.
As an added benefit, in each specialized directory, there's a playground
area that mimics the input/output of the common location, giving
developers a kind of sand box, without having to change anything once
the xslt stylesheet is used in production.
It is strictly organized this way. And it works. Except for finding the
xslt itself that is currently being executed.
Cheers,
-- Abel Braaksma
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [xsl] Referring to stylesheet itself, possible in XSLT 1.0, but how in XSLT 2.0?, (continued)
- Re: [xsl] Referring to stylesheet itself, possible in XSLT 1.0, but how in XSLT 2.0?, Abel Braaksma
- Re: [xsl] Referring to stylesheet itself, possible in XSLT 1.0, but how in XSLT 2.0?, Abel Braaksma
- Re: [xsl] Referring to stylesheet itself, possible in XSLT 1.0, but how in XSLT 2.0?, David Carlisle
- Re: [xsl] Referring to stylesheet itself, possible in XSLT 1.0, but how in XSLT 2.0?, Abel Braaksma
- Re: [xsl] Referring to stylesheet itself, possible in XSLT 1.0, but how in XSLT 2.0?, Andrew Welch
- Re: [xsl] Referring to stylesheet itself, possible in XSLT 1.0, but how in XSLT 2.0?, Abel Braaksma
- Re: [xsl] Referring to stylesheet itself, possible in XSLT 1.0, but how in XSLT, Colin Adams
- Re: [xsl] Referring to stylesheet itself, possible in XSLT 1.0, but how in XSLT, Colin Adams
- Re: [xsl] Referring to stylesheet itself, possible in XSLT 1.0, but how in XSLT,
Abel Braaksma <=
- Re: [xsl] Referring to stylesheet itself, possible in XSLT 1.0, but how in XSLT, Colin Adams
- Re: [xsl] Referring to stylesheet itself, possible in XSLT 1.0, but how in XSLT 2.0?, George Cristian Bina
- Re: [xsl] Referring to stylesheet itself, possible in XSLT 1.0, but how in XSLT 2.0?, Abel Braaksma
- Re: [xsl] Referring to stylesheet itself, possible in XSLT 1.0, but how in XSLT 2.0?, George Cristian Bina
- Re: [xsl] Referring to stylesheet itself, possible in XSLT 1.0, but how in XSLT 2.0?, Abel Braaksma
- Re: [xsl] Referring to stylesheet itself, possible in XSLT 1.0, but how in XSLT 2.0?, George Cristian Bina
|
Previous by Date: |
Re: [xsl] Referring to stylesheet itself, possible in XSLT 1.0, but how in XSLT, Colin Adams |
Next by Date: |
Re: [xsl] Referring to stylesheet itself, possible in XSLT 1.0, but how in XSLT, Colin Adams |
Previous by Thread: |
Re: [xsl] Referring to stylesheet itself, possible in XSLT 1.0, but how in XSLT, Colin Adams |
Next by Thread: |
Re: [xsl] Referring to stylesheet itself, possible in XSLT 1.0, but how in XSLT, Colin Adams |
Indexes: |
[Date]
[Thread]
[Top]
[All Lists] |
|
|