Re: [xsl] Referring to stylesheet itself, possible in XSLT 1.0, but how in XSLT 2.0?
2006-10-17 06:45:36
On 10/17/06, Abel Braaksma <abel(_dot_)online(_at_)xs4all(_dot_)nl> wrote:
David Carlisle wrote:
> Incidentally, why do you want to use document('')??
No reason in particular, other than getting the stylesheet that is
currently being executed. I tried all sorts of ideas and combinations of
ideas, but the result is simple: it cannot be done once you have the
xsl:stylesheet offset to some directory where your current stylesheet
does not reside.
So, if your stylesheet uses something like this:
<xsl:stylesheet xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform"
version="2.0" xml:base="../..">
but is itself not at location "../..", all bets are off for getting the
location of the current stylesheet.
Instead of using xml:base why not just create a parameter $path and
then modify all of your paths in the stylesheet to contain that
parameter, eg:
<xsl:param name="path" select="'../../'" as="xs:string"/>
and
href="{$path}existingpath"
cheers
andrew
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- RE: [xsl] Referring to stylesheet itself, possible in XSLT 1.0, but how in XSLT 2.0?, (continued)
- RE: [xsl] Referring to stylesheet itself, possible in XSLT 1.0, but how in XSLT 2.0?, Michael Kay
- Re: [xsl] Referring to stylesheet itself, possible in XSLT 1.0, but how in XSLT 2.0?, Andrew Welch
- RE: [xsl] Referring to stylesheet itself, possible in XSLT 1.0, but how in XSLT 2.0?, Michael Kay
- Re: [xsl] Referring to stylesheet itself, possible in XSLT 1.0, but how in XSLT 2.0?, Andrew Welch
- Re: [xsl] Referring to stylesheet itself, possible in XSLT 1.0, but how in XSLT 2.0?, David Carlisle
- Re: [xsl] Referring to stylesheet itself, possible in XSLT 1.0, but how in XSLT 2.0?, Abel Braaksma
- Re: [xsl] Referring to stylesheet itself, possible in XSLT 1.0, but how in XSLT 2.0?, Abel Braaksma
- Re: [xsl] Referring to stylesheet itself, possible in XSLT 1.0, but how in XSLT 2.0?, Abel Braaksma
- Re: [xsl] Referring to stylesheet itself, possible in XSLT 1.0, but how in XSLT 2.0?, David Carlisle
- Re: [xsl] Referring to stylesheet itself, possible in XSLT 1.0, but how in XSLT 2.0?, Abel Braaksma
- Re: [xsl] Referring to stylesheet itself, possible in XSLT 1.0, but how in XSLT 2.0?,
Andrew Welch <=
- Re: [xsl] Referring to stylesheet itself, possible in XSLT 1.0, but how in XSLT 2.0?, Abel Braaksma
- Re: [xsl] Referring to stylesheet itself, possible in XSLT 1.0, but how in XSLT, Colin Adams
- Re: [xsl] Referring to stylesheet itself, possible in XSLT 1.0, but how in XSLT, Colin Adams
- Re: [xsl] Referring to stylesheet itself, possible in XSLT 1.0, but how in XSLT, Abel Braaksma
- Re: [xsl] Referring to stylesheet itself, possible in XSLT 1.0, but how in XSLT, Colin Adams
- Re: [xsl] Referring to stylesheet itself, possible in XSLT 1.0, but how in XSLT 2.0?, George Cristian Bina
- Re: [xsl] Referring to stylesheet itself, possible in XSLT 1.0, but how in XSLT 2.0?, Abel Braaksma
- Re: [xsl] Referring to stylesheet itself, possible in XSLT 1.0, but how in XSLT 2.0?, George Cristian Bina
- Re: [xsl] Referring to stylesheet itself, possible in XSLT 1.0, but how in XSLT 2.0?, Abel Braaksma
- Re: [xsl] Referring to stylesheet itself, possible in XSLT 1.0, but how in XSLT 2.0?, George Cristian Bina
|
|
|