Michael Kay ha scritto:
Well for example for persons which develops in os linux (gcc)
and not microsoft who are developing in c for obtaining
maximum performance (and then they can't use JNI)....
Seems to be a flaw in the logic here. If you need very high performance, and
therefore need C, then why are you using XSLT?
Because I'm trying to obtain best performance in the business logic and
separate logic from presentation.
For example if my business logic takes 300 msec and my xslt trasform
takes 30 msec, I'm happy because even if xslt trasform takes 10% I have
separated data from presentation. The same logic in perl takes 600 msec,
and xslt trasform takes always 30 msec or similar and so on.
So I'd like to use saxon in c because it offers xslt2 support but in the
same way I'd like to continue to use c because my business logic is faster.
This my modest opinion.
Do you make provision for porting saxon in c?
Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--