On Tue, 2007-06-26 at 03:09 -0600, M. David Peterson wrote:
On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 02:52:01 -0600, bryan rasmussen
<rasmussen(_dot_)bryan(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com> wrote:
Hmm, not sure if I would classify Xquery as a functional language.
Declarative, sure, I guess query languages tend to be, but not sure
about the functional. Why do you say it is?
I agree that one could argue that XQuery is not a purely functional
programming language, but none-the-less, for all intents and purposes
I thought it was porpoises in tents ???
its
a functional language,
e.g. @ http://www.research.ibm.com/journal/sj/414/chamberlin.pdf
<quote>
XQuery is a functional
language comprised of several kinds of
expressions that can be nested and
composed with full generality.
</quote>
If not mistaken, the XQuery spec *used* to start off with something
similar to the above, but it seems it got cut from the final spec. Maybe
for a reason?
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--