xsl-list
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [xsl] Re: Output validation with XSLT 2.0

2008-05-04 08:30:00
 >  > Just read the relevant W3 Specs and any good XSLT book.

 You could reply with that to any question...

 not really, the relevant W3 specs are not meant to be read by users
of the language but implementors.

While user-friendliness is often not a goal, no such specification
forbids anyone from reading it, and users with a grain of curiosity
usually do.

Shouldn't users report bugs? How can we report a bug in an
implementation, without having read the spec?

And what if there are two good books that say different things about a
feature? Isn't then the spec the "true source" to be used in resolving
any such ambiguities?



-- 
Cheers,
Dimitre Novatchev
---------------------------------------
Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant intelligence.
---------------------------------------
To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk
-------------------------------------
Never fight an inanimate object
-------------------------------------
You've achieved success in your field when you don't know whether what
you're doing is work or play

--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--