Dimitre, you're well aware that the specification is not a tutorial.
Liam
I am well aware of that, Liam.
I am also aware that a specification does not necessarily have to look
and feel repulsive.
Examples of very good specifications are the XSLT 2.0 and the
XPath/XQuery F & O specs.
--
Cheers,
Dimitre Novatchev
---------------------------------------
Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant intelligence.
---------------------------------------
To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk
-------------------------------------
Never fight an inanimate object
-------------------------------------
You've achieved success in your field when you don't know whether what
you're doing is work or play
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 10:13 PM, Liam Quin <liam(_at_)w3(_dot_)org> wrote:
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 02:41:15PM -0700, Dimitre Novatchev wrote:
The spec is too complex and presents definite challenge for
understanding.
Dimitre, you're well aware that the specification is not a tutorial.
Liam
--
Liam Quin, W3C XML Activity Lead, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/
http://www.holoweb.net/~liam/ * http://www.fromoldbooks.org/
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail:
<mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--