Yes that is correct, this isn't an uncommon policy. Whether or not you agree
with it, I couldn't care less.
Again: I would appreciate it if we could please keep responses relevant to the
Munchenian technique question now.
Thanks
-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Welch [mailto:andrew(_dot_)j(_dot_)welch(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 1:16 PM
To: xsl-list(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com
Subject: Re: [xsl] Sort by one attribute & use Muenchian technique to group by
another attribute?
2009/6/10 Newman, John W <newmanjw(_at_)upmc(_dot_)edu>:
OK I wasn't looking to start a debate about build tools, don't worry about
our dep mgmt - we are doing just fine. I would appreciate it if we could
please keep responses relevant to the Munchenian technique question now.
Didn't you say:
"I am using XSLT 1.0 - I cannot upgrade to 2.0 at this time. If the
author of Saxon 9.0 would upload the releases to the central maven2
repository, myself and many more users might be able to do that. "
So if Saxon 9 was in the central repo you would use it, and because
it's not your are using 1.0 ?
--
Andrew Welch
http://andrewjwelch.com
Kernow: http://kernowforsaxon.sf.net/
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--