On 08/03/10 10:43, Andrew Welch wrote:
Here is a simplified exerpt of a test suite for the EXPath HTTP
Client:
<t:call function="http:send-request">
<!-- some param here... -->
</t:call>
<t:expect test="count($t:result) eq 2"/>
<t:expect test="$t:result[1] instance of element(http:response)"/>
<t:expect test="$t:result[1]/xs:integer(@status) eq 200"/>
<t:expect test="$t:result[2]/*">
<pass>...</pass>
</t:expect>
Ok this is a good example of the concept behind xchecker... that test
can easily be rewritten in XSLT - what you gain from the framework you
also lose in it restrictions (failure messages, variables etc).
There's nothing wrong with that at all by the way, I just think a
slightly different (and better) approach is possible.
Is this a case of needing something 'outside' of XSLT?
Perhaps a simple Java framework to allow for testing failures?
Call the transform with 'bad' data to trap all the xsl:message
terminate='yes', then having done that, move in to XSLT
to test for 'good' paths?
Any failures in this second phase are definitely terminal.
regards
--
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--