Re: [xsl] RE: Are there things missing in XSLT which force people to u

At 2010-10-30 22:01 +0100, Michael Kay wrote:
> On 30/10/2010 21:43, G. Ken Holman wrote:
> > There is no way (again: I know of) for
> > defining really new data types in a way comparable to, say, Haskell.
> This fact certainly defines a limitation of XQuery and XSLT in a way 
> that the absence of particular function libraries does not. The 
> languages are designed for processing XML, and the type system they 
> use is therefore strongly based on XML.
For the record, I didn't say that ... Wolfgang did.  I responded to 
it and quoted it in doing so.
. . . . . . . . Ken

--
Crane Softwrights Ltd.          http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/s/
G. Ken Holman                 mailto:gkholman(_at_)CraneSoftwrights(_dot_)com
Male Cancer Awareness Nov'07  http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/s/bc
Legal business disclaimers:  http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal


--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--