[xsl] RE: Are there things missing in XSLT which force people to use, say, Java to process XML?
2010-10-29 14:59:18
Hi Folks,
I recently saw the following assertions. Can you help me refute them please:
(1) XSLT is a complete programming language, but doesn't support
most things most developers need to do. (Graphics, networking,
relational database access, parsing HTTP headers, generating RSS
feeds, peer-to-peer networking, memory management & caching, thread
management, MIDI programming, the list goes on and on and on).
(2) Java (and others) were also designed to be enterprise-class programming
languages. This means the assumption that many programmers will
collaborate
around a large project. Encapsulation and complexity hiding are very
important.
A strongly typed, compiled language (not interpreted) is also important.
In short, XSLT wasn't designed for "programming in the large".
/Roger
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [xsl] Are there things missing in XSLT which force people to use, say, Java to process XML?, (continued)
- Re: [xsl] Are there things missing in XSLT which force people to use, say, Java to process XML?, jeroen
- Re: [xsl] Are there things missing in XSLT which force people to use, say, Java to process XML?, Imsieke, Gerrit, le-tex
- Re: [xsl] Are there things missing in XSLT which force people to use, say, Java to process XML?, Imsieke, Gerrit, le-tex
Re: [xsl] Are there things missing in XSLT which force people to use, say, Java to process XML?, Christopher R. Maden
[xsl] RE: Are there things missing in XSLT which force people to use, say, Java to process XML?, Costello, Roger L.
- [xsl] RE: Are there things missing in XSLT which force people to use, say, Java to process XML?,
Costello, Roger L. <=
- Message not available
- Re: [xsl] RE: Are there things missing in XSLT which force people to use, say, Java to process XML?, G. Ken Holman
- Re: [xsl] RE: Are there things missing in XSLT which force people to use, say, Java to process XML?, Wolfgang Laun
- Message not available
- Re: [xsl] RE: Are there things missing in XSLT which force people to use, say, Java to process XML?, G. Ken Holman
- Re: [xsl] RE: Are there things missing in XSLT which force people to use, say, Java to process XML?, Michael Kay
- Re: [xsl] RE: Are there things missing in XSLT which force people to use, say, Java to process XML?, G. Ken Holman
- Re: [xsl] RE: Are there things missing in XSLT which force people to use, say, Java to process XML?, Wolfgang Laun
- Re: [xsl] RE: Are there things missing in XSLT which force people to use, say, Java to process XML?, Michael Kay
- Re: [xsl] RE: Are there things missing in XSLT which force people to use, say, Java to process XML?, Wolfgang Laun
Re: [xsl] RE: Are there things missing in XSLT which force people to use, say, Java to process XML?, Michael Kay
Re: [xsl] RE: Are there things missing in XSLT which force people to use, say, Java to process XML?, ac
|
Previous by Date: |
[xsl] RE: Are there things missing in XSLT which force people to use, say, Java to process XML?, Costello, Roger L. |
Next by Date: |
Re: [xsl] RE: Are there things missing in XSLT which force people to use, say, Java to process XML?, G. Ken Holman |
Previous by Thread: |
[xsl] RE: Are there things missing in XSLT which force people to use, say, Java to process XML?, Costello, Roger L. |
Next by Thread: |
Re: [xsl] RE: Are there things missing in XSLT which force people to use, say, Java to process XML?, G. Ken Holman |
Indexes: |
[Date]
[Thread]
[Top]
[All Lists] |
|
|