Re: [xsl] RE: Are there things missing in XSLT which force people to use

 I'd guess this is due to XSLT 2.0 achieving more by less lines.

On 31 October 2010 10:51, Michael Kay <mike(_at_)saxonica(_dot_)com> wrote:
> > It would be interesting to learn about some industry data, such as the 
> > number of
> > lines of code resulting from and/or person years spent on a single
> > XSLT project.
> You'll see some large numbers, but I'm not sure that's a good thing. The 
> numbers for XSLT 2.0 are probably a lot smaller than the numbers for 1.0, 
> which doesn't exactly mean that XSLT 2.0 is less suited to large-scale 
> programming.
>
> Michael Kay
> Saxonica
>
> --~------------------------------------------------------------------
> XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
> To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
> or e-mail: 
> <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
> --~--
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--