Re: [xsl] RE: Are there things missing in XSLT which force people to use, say, Java to process XML?
2010-10-31 04:51:15
It would be interesting to learn about some industry data, such as the number of
lines of code resulting from and/or person years spent on a single
XSLT project.
You'll see some large numbers, but I'm not sure that's a good thing. The
numbers for XSLT 2.0 are probably a lot smaller than the numbers for
1.0, which doesn't exactly mean that XSLT 2.0 is less suited to
large-scale programming.
Michael Kay
Saxonica
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [xsl] Are there things missing in XSLT which force people to use, say, Java to process XML?, (continued)
- Re: [xsl] Are there things missing in XSLT which force people to use, say, Java to process XML?, Christopher R. Maden
- [xsl] RE: Are there things missing in XSLT which force people to use, say, Java to process XML?, Costello, Roger L.
- [xsl] RE: Are there things missing in XSLT which force people to use, say, Java to process XML?, Costello, Roger L.
- Message not available
- Re: [xsl] RE: Are there things missing in XSLT which force people to use, say, Java to process XML?, G. Ken Holman
- Re: [xsl] RE: Are there things missing in XSLT which force people to use, say, Java to process XML?, Wolfgang Laun
- Message not available
- Re: [xsl] RE: Are there things missing in XSLT which force people to use, say, Java to process XML?, G. Ken Holman
- Re: [xsl] RE: Are there things missing in XSLT which force people to use, say, Java to process XML?, Michael Kay
- Re: [xsl] RE: Are there things missing in XSLT which force people to use, say, Java to process XML?, G. Ken Holman
- Re: [xsl] RE: Are there things missing in XSLT which force people to use, say, Java to process XML?, Wolfgang Laun
- Re: [xsl] RE: Are there things missing in XSLT which force people to use, say, Java to process XML?,
Michael Kay <=
- Re: [xsl] RE: Are there things missing in XSLT which force people to use, say, Java to process XML?, Wolfgang Laun
- Re: [xsl] RE: Are there things missing in XSLT which force people to use, say, Java to process XML?, Michael Kay
- Re: [xsl] RE: Are there things missing in XSLT which force people to use, say, Java to process XML?, ac
- Re: [xsl] RE: Are there things missing in XSLT which force people to use, say, Java to process XML?, ac
- Re: [xsl] RE: Are there things missing in XSLT which force people to use, say, Java to process XML?, Max Toro
Re: [xsl] RE: Are there things missing in XSLT which force people to use, say, Java to process XML?, David Carlisle
Re: [xsl] Are there things missing in XSLT which force people to use, say, Java to process XML?, Mukul Gandhi
Re: [xsl] Are there things missing in XSLT which force people to use, say, Java to process XML?, Xmlizer
Re: [xsl] Are there things missing in XSLT which force people to use, say, Java to process XML?, Stefan Krause
|
Previous by Date: |
Re: [xsl] RE: Are there things missing in XSLT which force people to use, say, Java to process XML?, Wolfgang Laun |
Next by Date: |
Re: [xsl] Are there things missing in XSLT which force people to use, say, Java to process XML?, Stefan Krause |
Previous by Thread: |
Re: [xsl] RE: Are there things missing in XSLT which force people to use, say, Java to process XML?, Wolfgang Laun |
Next by Thread: |
Re: [xsl] RE: Are there things missing in XSLT which force people to use, say, Java to process XML?, Wolfgang Laun |
Indexes: |
[Date]
[Thread]
[Top]
[All Lists] |
|
|