xsl-list
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [xsl] xsl 2.0?

2013-11-04 04:59:03
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Worse_is_better

On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Toshihiko Makita 
<tmakita(_at_)antenna(_dot_)co(_dot_)jp>
wrote:



The effort for maintaining and debugging for making publication does not
become decreased by adopting of the CSS. Rather it will be increased by its
architecture than XSL-FO especially in debugging.

I heard that production level CSS stylesheet become over 3000 steps. If
the final publication is not so complex, CSS can be a good solution. However
maintaining and debugging the styles for publication by CSS is not so easy
than XSL-FO.

If my opinion has a misunderstanding, please indicate.


--~--



--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>