Note: This post is meant to be taken tongue-in-cheek, preferably after
listening to Monty Python's "String" routine
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 7:18 PM, Graydon <graydon(_at_)marost(_dot_)ca> wrote:
XML doesn't work like anything else; XML is graph theory
Why that's our selling point!
All we have to do is rebrand XSLT with a nifty label that showcases it
as a paradigm-shifting language. Don't call it "a stylesheet language
for transforming XML," call it "A directed-Graph-Object Language."
And when someone asks what a "directed-Graph Object" is, don't say
"It's xml." Say "It's a kind of ultra-robust, annotated link-list
datatype that allows multiple outgoing references from each entry!"
Just think of all the amazing stuff you can do with an "ultra-robust,
annotated link-list datatype that allows multiple outgoing references
from each entry!"
:J
-David
--
"A false conclusion, once arrived at and widely accepted is not
dislodged easily, and the less it is understood, the more tenaciously
it is held." - Cantor's Law of Preservation of Ignorance.
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--