Hi Dan,
At 14:34 08-06-2006, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
Okay. My results for every reflector listed on testing.dkim.org
(with every possible signing mode) are here (and they're DISMAL):
Thanks for the notes on the autoresponders.
Your DKIM signature fails verification.
In any case, no detail is mentioned about how these differ, unless I
feel like reading the drafts (and no links are provided, even so it
would be a TEDIOUS read).
You can find the drafts of the implementation in the dk/dkim milter
tarballs. The latest version of dkim-milter uses ietf-base-01 by default.
* Can anyone post contact addresses for issues with these
reflectors? Ideally we need more info, such as: what testing method
they're using, contact address, what standards they support.
You can post dkim-milter questions to the dkim-milter mailing
list. I'm copying this email to you as the one you receive from this
list will fail verification.
Regards,
-sm
_______________________________________________
dkim-ops mailing list
dkim-ops(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/dkim-ops