Hi Dan,
At 16:21 08-06-2006, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
I'm guessing there's no space within the spec for a signature to
include which spec it was signed to be in compliance with -- and to
ignore otherwise, or use the all-important feedback address?
No, the signature doesn't include which draft it follows at the
moment. The autoresponders should be backward compatible and verify
a DKIM signature for a previous implementation. There is an email
address mentioned in the specifications. There are also contact
addresses on the websites.
Well, I was more looking for contacts at each individual site
running a reflector. Leaving a decaying piece of software out in
the open is not a good thing.
I doubt the reflectors are running decaying software. :)
MTA
MTA Version
The above two do not affect DKIM verification.
DKIM Verifier (milter/spamassassin plugin/etc?)
Most of the verifiers are either milter-based or an in-house
implementation. If I am not mistaken, the ones you listed do not use
the Spamassassin plugin.
Regards,
-sm
_______________________________________________
dkim-ops mailing list
dkim-ops(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/dkim-ops