Maarten Bezemer <mcbff(_at_)opensourcepartners(_dot_)nl> writes:
As I said, I didn't yet look into the mda or the escaping stuff. I still
did not do that. The only thing I know right now that "<>" needs special
treatment some way or another, as it's a special case by design. Using
"" instead of "<>" doesn't work, but escaping "<>" to "__" isn't right
either.
"" should work, "<>" is just a workaround for broken sendmails (up to
and including 8.12.6, maybe even later, haven't checked 8.12.7).
--
Matthias Andree