cedric gross wrote:
* WHERE : why not sourceforge.net ? they provide a lot of tools.
Not only do they not provide Subversion as Matthias mentioned, a lot of
people have had a lot of problems there that ultimately stem from
sourceforge not scaling well. For example, last I heard public CVS access
is delayed by a day -- you check out what was checked in yesterday, not
what was checked in today. That causes huge confusion.
* HOW : I know that on sourceforge we are able to manage sevral branch
mainly -stable and -devel. So I suggest to release 6.2.6 as stable
branch and doing some devel stuff based on it.
First we need a bug-fixed release. In the long term it probably makes sense
to keep 6.2.* as bug-fixes only, and do any major work on a new branch
(e.g. 6.3). I'm just conditioned by CVS to hate branches; SVN may break
me of that.
--
==============================| "A slice of life isn't the whole cake
Rob Funk <rfunk(_at_)funknet(_dot_)net> | One tooth will never make a full
grin"
http://www.funknet.net/rfunk | -- Chris Mars, "Stuck in Rewind"