Re: Richmail & Idraw

Excerpts from mail: 13-Jun-91 Re: Richmail & Idraw John C
Klensin(_at_)INFOODS(_dot_)M (1421)

  This is, of course, not a problem if one promises to never try to use 
Nathaniel-mail to transport an SGML document, but that is, of course, 
the very first thing some of us would try to do.


I guess that I have no problem with using RFC-XXXX to transport SGML
documents, but I'd hate to see people interpret "richmail"
("Nathaniel-mail"???!!!???) as "arbitrary SGML".  I'd like to see other
content-types defined for the purpose, e.g. "text-plus/sgml-dtd-foo".

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Statistics -- richmail utility, (continued) Re: Statistics -- richmail utility, Erik M. van der Poel Re: Statistics -- richmail utility, Einar Stefferud Re: Statistics -- richmail utility, Terry Crowley Re: Statistics -- richmail utility, Nathaniel Borenstein Re: Statistics -- richmail utility, Brian Wideen Re: Statistics -- richmail utility, Nathaniel Borenstein Richmail & Idraw, Bill Janssen Re: Richmail & Idraw, Nathaniel Borenstein Re: Richmail & Idraw, Brian Wideen Re: Richmail & Idraw, John C Klensin Re: Richmail & Idraw, Nathaniel Borenstein <= Re: Richmail & Idraw, John C Klensin Re: Richmail & Idraw, Jonathan Rosenberg Re: Statistics -- richmail utility, jwn2

Previous by Date:	Re: Richmail & Idraw, John C Klensin
Next by Date:	Re: (i18n 97) Re: data announcement, John C Klensin
Previous by Thread:	Re: Richmail & Idraw, John C Klensin
Next by Thread:	Re: Richmail & Idraw, John C Klensin
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]