ISO-2022 as a separate RFC


I think the suggestion to move the standardization of ISO-2022 with
respect to character-set identification is a good one.  I'm willing
to volunteer to write the first draft of such a specification for
Japan, PRC, Korea, and Taiwan, and have started to gather the
data from Sun's localization centers for standard 2022 usage
in their locale (if any...).

        Neil

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
ISO-2022 as a separate RFC, Neil Katin <= Re: ISO-2022 as a separate RFC, Einar Stefferud re: ISO-2022 as a separate RFC, Mark Crispin Re: ISO-2022 as a separate RFC, Ned Freed, Postmaster Re: ISO-2022 as a separate RFC, Mark Crispin Re: ISO-2022 as a separate RFC, Ned Freed, Postmaster Re: ISO-2022 as a separate RFC, Nathaniel Borenstein Re: ISO-2022 as a separate RFC, Greg Vaudreuil Re: ISO-2022 as a separate RFC, Dave Crocker Re: ISO-2022 as a separate RFC, Keld J\|rn Simonsen

Previous by Date:	ISO 2022, Randall Atkinson
Next by Date:	Re: ISO-2022 as a separate RFC, Einar Stefferud
Previous by Thread:	ISO 2022, Randall Atkinson
Next by Thread:	Re: ISO-2022 as a separate RFC, Einar Stefferud
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]