IETF 822 (date)
November 16, 1991
- Re: audio, checksums, and trojan horses, Ned Freed, Postmaster, 21:52
- Re: audio, checksums, and trojan horses, henry, 21:32
- Re: audio, checksums, and trojan horses, Keld J|rn Simonsen, 21:04
- Re: NETF and EUnet on mnemonic, Keld J|rn Simonsen, 19:59
- Re: PLEASE READ -- Open issues list for RFC-XXXX, Keld J|rn Simonsen, 19:56
- Re: PostScript (Was: Re: audio, checksums, and trojan horses), Ned Freed, Postmaster, 18:14
- Re: ISO-2022 as a separate RFC, Keld J|rn Simonsen, 16:53
- Re: audio, checksums, and trojan horses, Johnny Eriksson, 13:37
- Re: a checksum summary?, Dave Crocker, 13:22
- Re: PostScript (Was: Re: audio, checksums, and trojan horses), Timo Lehtinen, 09:04
- Re: PostScript (Was: Re: audio, checksums, and trojan horses), Timo Lehtinen, 09:04
- Re: a checksum summary?, Ned Freed, Postmaster, 03:53
November 15, 1991
- Re: PostScript (Was: Re: audio, checksums, and trojan horses), Ned Freed, Postmaster, 15:40
- Re: PostScript (Was: Re: audio, checksums, and trojan horses), jknowles, 14:54
- Re: /alternative, jknowles, 14:30
- Re: /alternative, Andrew Partan, 14:15
- latest draft of header-charset proposal, Keith Moore, 13:42
- PS -- Re: /alternative, Nathaniel Borenstein, 12:36
- Re: /alternative, Nathaniel Borenstein, 12:36
- Re: /alternative, jknowles, 12:26
- Re: audio, checksums, and trojan horses, Valdis Kletnieks, 12:25
- Re: /alternative and the impact of fancy mail, John C Klensin, 11:08
- Re: audio, checksums, and trojan horses, jknowles, 10:59
- Re: a checksum summary?, Dave Crocker, 09:57
- Re: audio, checksums, and trojan horses, Alain FONTAINE (Postmaster - NAD), 09:26
- a checksum summary?, James M Galvin, 08:34
- Re: /alternative and the impact of fancy mail, Nathaniel Borenstein, 07:25
- Re: audio, checksums, and trojan horses, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 03:35
- Re: Trivial checksums for BASE-64, Pekka . Kytolaakso, 02:07
November 14, 1991
- Re: /alternative and the impact of fancy mail, Bill Janssen, 20:32
- Re: /alternative, Bob, 20:20
- Re: PostScript (Was: Re: audio, checksums, and trojan horses), Bill Janssen, 19:36
- Re: Trivial checksums for BASE-64, Bill Janssen, 19:29
- Re: Trivial checksums for BASE-64, Roger Fajman, 16:21
- Late comments from KTH, Olle Jarnefors, 16:03
- Re: /alternative and the impact of fancy mail, Nathaniel Borenstein, 12:12
- Re: Trivial checksums for BASE-64, John C Klensin, 12:11
- Re: /alternative and the impact of fancy mail, Einar Stefferud, 10:30
- Re: PostScript (Was: Re: audio, checksums, and trojan horses), jknowles, 10:26
- Re: /alternative, John C Klensin, 08:33
- Re: another issue: should end-of-line markers remain in RFC XXXX?, Louis A. Mamakos, 08:20
- Re: /alternative, Nathaniel Borenstein, 07:44
- Re: Trivial checksums for BASE-64, Nathaniel Borenstein, 07:43
- Re: /alternative, Nathaniel Borenstein, 07:21
- Re: Trivial checksums for BASE-64, Nathaniel Borenstein, 07:17
- PS -- Re: /alternative, Nathaniel Borenstein, 07:17
- /alternative and the impact of fancy mail, John C Klensin, 02:36
- Re: another issue: should end-of-line markers remain in RFC XXXX?, John C Klensin, 01:37
- Re: /alternative, Einar Stefferud, 01:24
November 13, 1991
- another issue: should end-of-line markers remain in RFC XXXX?, Keith Moore, 23:15
- Re: Trivial checksums for BASE-64, Keith Moore, 21:37
- Re: /alternative, Bill Janssen, 20:13
- Re: Re: audio, checksums, and trojan horses, David Herron, 19:19
- Re: Re: Trivial checksums for BASE-64, David Herron, 19:18
- Re: /alternative, John C Klensin, 18:19
- Re: audio, checksums, and trojan horses, Ned Freed, Postmaster, 16:53
- Re: PostScript (Was: Re: audio, checksums, and trojan horses), Ned Freed, Postmaster, 15:54
- Re: /alternative, Nathaniel Borenstein, 12:18
- Re: PostScript (Was: Re: audio, checksums, and trojan horses), jknowles, 11:17
- fancy text of various kinds, henry, 10:15
- Re: /alternative, jknowles, 10:11
- Re: audio, checksums, and trojan horses, Pekka . Kytolaakso, 10:08
- Re: ISO-2022 as a separate RFC, Greg Vaudreuil, 10:04
- Re: audio, checksums, and trojan horses, Dave Crocker, 09:16
- Re: PostScript (Was: Re: audio, checksums, and trojan horses), Dave Crocker, 09:12
- Re: ISO-2022 as a separate RFC, Dave Crocker, 09:06
- Re: ISO-2022 as a separate RFC, Nathaniel Borenstein, 08:41
- Re: Trivial checksums for BASE-64, Nathaniel Borenstein, 08:40
- Re: Content-ID's, Nathaniel Borenstein, 08:33
- Re: audio, checksums, and trojan horses, Nathaniel Borenstein, 08:33
- Re: audio, checksums, and trojan horses, Nathaniel Borenstein, 08:17
- PostScript (Was: Re: audio, checksums, and trojan horses), Timo Lehtinen, 05:47
- Re: ISO-2022 as a separate RFC, Ned Freed, Postmaster, 04:00
- Trivial checksums for BASE-64, Alain FONTAINE (Postmaster - NAD), 03:25
- Re: ISO-2022 as a separate RFC, Mark Crispin, 00:57
November 12, 1991
- Re: audio, checksums, and trojan horses, Ned Freed, Postmaster, 23:00
- Re: ISO 2022, Masahiro SEKIGUCHI, 21:56
- Re: audio, checksums, and trojan horses, Louis A. Mamakos, 20:37
- Re: audio, checksums, and trojan horses, Bill Janssen, 20:09
- Re: ISO-2022 as a separate RFC, Ned Freed, Postmaster, 20:02
- Re: audio, checksums, and trojan horses, jknowles, 17:03
- re: ISO-2022 as a separate RFC, Mark Crispin, 13:17
- Re: ISO-2022 as a separate RFC, Einar Stefferud, 11:02
- ISO-2022 as a separate RFC, Neil Katin, 07:10
- ISO 2022, Randall Atkinson, 06:26
November 11, 1991
- Re: audio, checksums, and trojan horses, Ned Freed, Postmaster, 23:25
- Re: checksums on open issues list, Ned Freed, Postmaster, 17:40
- Re: checksums on open issues list, James M Galvin, 14:47
- Re: PLEASE READ -- Open issues list for RFC-XXXX, Mark Crispin, 14:22
- Re: NETF and EUnet on mnemonic, Nathaniel Borenstein, 13:36
- Re: PLEASE READ -- Open issues list for RFC-XXXX, Einar Stefferud, 12:28
- Re: NETF and EUnet on mnemonic, Dave Crocker, 08:43
- Re: PLEASE READ -- Open issues list for RFC-XXXX, John C Klensin, 08:11
- Re: NETF and EUnet on mnemonic, John C Klensin, 07:54
November 10, 1991
- Re: RFC XXXX's proper domain, Einar Stefferud, 21:29
- Re: PLEASE READ -- Open issues list for RFC-XXXX, Mark Crispin, 20:34
- Re: RFC XXXX's proper domain, Paul A Vixie, 18:53
- Re: PLEASE READ -- Open issues list for RFC-XXXX, Neil Katin, 17:27
- RFC XXXX's proper domain, Dave Crocker, 16:51
- Re: PLEASE READ -- Open issues list for RFC-XXXX, Sven-Ove Westberg, 05:07
- Re: NETF and EUnet on mnemonic, Sven-Ove Westberg, 04:49
November 08, 1991
- Re: PLEASE READ -- Open issues list for RFC-XXXX, Greg Vaudreuil, 15:18
- re: checksums on open issues list, Mark Crispin, 15:02
- checksums on open issues list, henry, 13:53
- Re: PLEASE READ -- Open issues list for RFC-XXXX, Dave Crocker, 09:32
- Re: PLEASE READ -- Open issues list for RFC-XXXX, Marshall Rose, 09:15
- Re: PLEASE READ -- Open issues list for RFC-XXXX, Timo Lehtinen, 08:50
- Re: PLEASE READ -- Open issues list for RFC-XXXX, Nathaniel Borenstein, 07:20
- Re: Different approach to defining encodings, Nathaniel Borenstein, 07:01
- Re: PLEASE READ - Open Issues..., John C Klensin, 00:58
November 07, 1991
- Re: PLEASE READ - Open Issues..., Ned Freed, Postmaster, 21:53
- Re: PLEASE READ - Open Issues..., David Robinson, 19:27
- Re: Different approach to defining encodings, David Robinson, 19:10
- Re: PLEASE READ -- Open issues list for RFC-XXXX, Marshall Rose, 18:27
- Re: Different approach to defining encodings, Neil Katin, 14:59
- Re: Different approach to defining encodings, Nathaniel Borenstein, 13:34
- Re: PLEASE READ -- Open issues list for RFC-XXXX, John C Klensin, 05:03
- audio, checksums, and trojan horses, Bill Janssen, 02:50
- PLEASE READ -- Open issues list for RFC-XXXX, Ned Freed, Postmaster, 00:53
November 01, 1991
- Re: New Audio Stuff, david, 16:43
- Audio redux, Nathaniel Borenstein, 14:14
- New Audio Stuff, Nathaniel Borenstein, 12:55
- Metamail release, Nathaniel Borenstein, 12:48
- Re: checksums, Neil Katin, 11:07
- Re: RFC XXXX Security issues WAS: trojan horses in RFC XXXX mail, Nathaniel Borenstein, 09:54