Re: audio, checksums, and trojan horses

Jim,
a separate RFC is perfectly satisfactory to me.
NOTE: AS LONG AS it is progressed ASAP.
I thought of writing an RFC myself, but thought that Keith wanted
hos own name as author.
Hope we can get to that tomorrow.
From the IETF terminal room....

         Harald Tveit Alvestrand

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: /alternative, (continued) Re: /alternative, Nathaniel Borenstein Re: /alternative, John C Klensin Re: /alternative, jknowles Re: /alternative, Nathaniel Borenstein Re: /alternative, jknowles PS -- Re: /alternative, Nathaniel Borenstein Re: /alternative, Andrew Partan Re: audio, checksums, and trojan horses, Pekka . Kytolaakso Re: audio, checksums, and trojan horses, Harald Tveit Alvestrand Re: audio, checksums, and trojan horses, jknowles Re: audio, checksums, and trojan horses, Harald Tveit Alvestrand <= Re: audio, checksums, and trojan horses, Valdis Kletnieks Re: audio, checksums, and trojan horses, Bill Janssen PostScript (Was: Re: audio, checksums, and trojan horses), Timo Lehtinen Re: PostScript (Was: Re: audio, checksums, and trojan horses), Dave Crocker Re: PostScript (Was: Re: audio, checksums, and trojan horses), jknowles fancy text of various kinds, henry Re: audio, checksums, and trojan horses, Ned Freed, Postmaster Re: audio, checksums, and trojan horses, Ned Freed, Postmaster Re: Re: audio, checksums, and trojan horses, David Herron Re: audio, checksums, and trojan horses, Alain FONTAINE (Postmaster - NAD)