Re: Character set Detail Considered Harmful1991-12-23 16:06:45Vint, Accurate, concise, and clear (as usual.) You have summarized my suggestion correctly. To make sure that there isn't any derivative confusion, I'll note (per an exchange a couple of days ago with Nathaniel) that I do believe that XXXX needs to have its current citation of US-ASCII, in order to "prime the pump" for character set usage, and to make sure that XXXX, starts from the same place that RFC 822. Dave
|
|