Re: language tags

I'm starting to think that the two-letter ISO 639 codes might be better than
the UDC numbers after all, if only because the ISO 639 codes are already
used in computer systems, for example in the LANG environment variable on
many UNIX systems.

However, my copy of ISO 639 (dated 1967) only lists 37 languages, and our
library's ISO Catalogue (which is itself a few years old) lists the 1967
document as being the latest list of language symbols.  Are these sufficient?

Keith

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Language header already defined, (continued) Language header already defined, Harald Tveit Alvestrand Re: Language header already defined, John C Klensin Re: Language header already defined, Harald Tveit Alvestrand Re: 10646, and all that, Erik M. van der Poel Re: 10646, and all that, John C Klensin Re: language tags, Steve Summit Re: language tags, Keith Moore Re: language tags, Steve Summit Re: language tags, Keith Moore Re: language tags, John C Klensin Re: language tags, Keith Moore <= Re: language tags, Dana S Emery Re: language tags, Keith Moore Re: language tags, Dana S Emery Re: language tags, Masataka Ohta Re: 10646, and all that, Erik M. van der Poel Re: 10646, and all that, Dana S Emery Re: 10646, and all that, Erik M. van der Poel Re: 10646, and all that, Erik M. van der Poel Re: 10646, and all that, Masataka Ohta Re: 10646, and all that, Erik M. van der Poel

Previous by Date:	Re: language tags, Dana S Emery
Next by Date:	Re: 10646, and all that, Masataka Ohta
Previous by Thread:	Re: language tags, John C Klensin
Next by Thread:	Re: language tags, Dana S Emery
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]