... but I think that my basic idea was a good one, and that when we go
to full standard the spec should add "Subject" to the list of headers
taken from the inner part. Any other opinions? -- Nathaniel
It's a good idea, but the subject of the inner message ought to be
available so that the human recipient can decide whether to read
it now or later or discard it or whatever. And yet it seems that we
should not require that the subjects of the container messages
be identical to the subject of the contained message. So I suggest
defining a "subject" parameter for content-type message/partial, which
must reflect the subject of the contained message.
Keith