Well, currently the www community calls HTML "Content-Type: text/html".
This is unfortunate, since RTF is application/rtf...
It was probably one of those "hard to call" decisions.
You might get away with blaming Nathaniel for it. ;-) I for one have
a filter that marginally handles either text/html or text/enriched.
Personally I hope that they (the WWW community) DO NOT
adopt application/html. HTML is at least eyeballable, unlike RTF,
PostScript, etc. The same can be said of text/enriched.
--Dan
--
Dan Grillo dan_grillo(_at_)next(_dot_)com (415) 780-2963
--
Rick Troth <troth(_at_)rice(_dot_)edu>, Rice University, Information Systems
(grieving for Michael Daniel Smith and Alexander Tyler Smith)