! Anything which is not simple text and which, therefore, needs to be
! labeled. If it needs to be labeled but is not encapsulated in Mime, I
! believe it violates the intent of RFC822, for general interoperability.
I don't understand why the conformity to rfc822 depends on MIME.
rfc822 can not refer to MIME because it was published long before rfc1341.
Your comment above seems to be your new interpretation since
MIME was published, not the original intent of rfc822.
Or, is the necessity of labeling written in rfc822?
If that kind of new interpretation is accaptable even though
it is not the original intent, yet another interpretation, that allows
iso-2022-jp, may also be reasonable.
// Satoshi KINOSHITA