Re: MIME boundary question

Argh, discard-text is wrong.  It should be:

discard-text := *(*text CRLF) *text


How could I have missed that? Its basically the same as the broken definition
in RFC1521. I *know* I corrected it at one point. Another case of eyes seeing
what they wanted to see rather than what's there.

                                Ned

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
RE: MIME boundary question, (continued) RE: MIME boundary question, Exchange Re: MIME boundary question, Pete Resnick Re: MIME boundary question, Glenn Vanderburg Re: MIME boundary question, hansen Re: MIME boundary question, Ned Freed Re[2]: MIME boundary question, Geoffrey A. Harper Re: MIME boundary question, Steve Dorner Re: MIME boundary question, John Gardiner Myers Re: MIME boundary question, Ned Freed Re: MIME boundary question, John Gardiner Myers Re: MIME boundary question, Ned Freed <= Re: MIME boundary question, hansen Re: MIME boundary question, John Gardiner Myers Re: MIME boundary question, Steve Dorner Re: MIME boundary question, hansen Re: MIME boundary question, John Gardiner Myers Re: MIME boundary question, Rick Troth Re: MIME boundary question, hansen Re: MIME boundary question, Steve Dorner Re: MIME boundary question, John W. Noerenberg Re: MIME boundary question, John Gardiner Myers

Previous by Date:	Eudora VS Mime RFC (continued), sanbornd
Next by Date:	Re: MIME boundary question, hansen
Previous by Thread:	Re: MIME boundary question, John Gardiner Myers
Next by Thread:	Re: MIME boundary question, hansen
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]