It's good we're now speaking from the same script. Thanks.
As I understand Keith's suggestion, it requires replacing the URLs in
a message with local file names. I.e., it *requires* altering the
text/html body part. I am opposed to any solution that imposes
such a policy.
Some environments might require that but to impose it on everyone is a
"bad idea". After taking the html out of the mail message there's no
way to come back and check with the sender to see if it is correct.
If you don't change it you can always recompute a hash or, if
available, reverify the signature.
Best.../Ed
On Tue, 07 Nov 1995 18:03:20 +0100 Jacob Palme wrote:
Sorry, I had misunderstood your solution. I thought you had
to modify the Web browser to handle its internal caches the
way you want.
I am not sure about the advantages and disadvantages of
communicating with a Web browser via munching of its internal
caches.
Another solution would be to set up a proxy HTTP server, and
have the Web browser get all its HTTP info via this server.
Both these solution seem to me quite advanced, Keith Moores
idea with files seems simpler.
...